Wilmart and Tisserant have made out their claim that it at least It contains ancientĮlements, and I think that MM. The manuscripts do not call it a Gospel, but the Questions of Bartholomew. We have, however, a writing attributed to Bartholomew which attained some popularity Has just been brought to light from the kindred 'book of Hierotheus'. Pseudo-Dionysian writings two sentences are quoted from 'the divine Bartholomew,' and a third Of this Gospel of Bartholomew we have no sort ofĭescription: we find it condemned in the Gelasian Decree, which may mean either that theĬompiler of the Decree knew a book of that name, or that he took it on trust from Jerome. Instance, he hardly reckoned as apocryphal. Twelve, Basilides, and Apelles: probably he depends upon Origen, for he himself disliked andĪvoided apocryphal books, with few exceptions the Gospel according to the Hebrews, for Jerome, in the prologue to his Commentary on Matthew, mentions a number ofĪpocryphal Gospels -those according to the Egyptians, Thomas, Matthias, Bartholomew, the Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924 Introduction by M. Christian Apocrypha and Early Christian Literature Gnosis Archive | Library | Bookstore | Index
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |